Mercifully, 'Scrotum humanum' isn't actually a name. It was never
intended as a binomial, and there's no reason to treat it as one
since.
For more info:
https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url="">
On Sat, Aug 1, 2020 at 11:20 AM John Schneiderman
<john-schneiderman@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Best Name:
>
> Tyrannosaurus rex Osborn, 1905
>
> Popular then and now
>
> means: "tyrant lizard king"
>
>
> Worst Names:
>
> Ponerosteus exogyrarum (FriÄ,1878) George Olshevsky, 2000
>
> Originally, "Iguanodon exogirarum" AntonÃn FriÄ,1878. = Procerosaurus exogyrarum
>
> means: "worthless bone among the Exogyra (a fossil marine oyster)"
>
>
> "Scrotum humanum" Brookes, 1763 ( = Megalosaurus bucklandii)
>
> means: "human testicles"
>
> On July 31, 2020 at 1:21 AM Iain Reid <
iainstein27@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have to say I am partial to Ngewvu and Mnyamawamtuka despite difficulties for some people to pronounce and spell. I second mike that Brontomerus stands out, but I find -oposeidon a bit cumbersome no offense. Lythronax and Polacanthus also seem appealing
to me.
>
> The worst for me have to be a tossup of unbelievably shortened or flowless names like Yi, Zby, Thanos, or Iguanocolossus or Thanatotheristes. Intentions were good but not good enough.
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2020, 1:46 PM Poekilopleuron <
dinosaurtom2015@seznam.cz> wrote:
>
> Good day to all listmembers! I would like to ask, what in your opinion is the "best" (coolest) and "worst" generic name of non-avian dinosaurs? Thank you for your thoughts, in advance! Tom
>
>
>