In all fairness, "quite different" is relative. Neornithes limb mechanics
are very similar to dinosaurs in their articular contacts (even accounting
for fusion of the metapodia and the tibiotarsus). Limb excursion (as Tim
and Jim and Jim noted) is generated somewhat differently (shifting from
the primitive acetabulum based locomotion to the more derived knee-based
limb excursion), but the maximum and minimum ranges of motion are very
similar, including off-axis motion (which is important). And the actual
plantar surface of the feet (and the internal bones, tendons, and
ligaments that create it) of modern cursorial dinosaurs are almost
identical in how they function to their Mesozoic brethren. Certainly much
better than using most extant placental feet to understand the
biomechanics of Mesozoic mammal trackways.
Scott
Scott Hartman
Science Director
Wyoming Dinosaur Center
110 Carter Ranch Rd.
Thermopolis, WY 82443
(800) 455-3466 ext. 230
Cell: (307) 921-8333
www.skeletaldrawing.com
-----Original Message-----
From: jrccea@bellsouth.net
To: andreasj@gmail.com; dinosaur@usc.edu
Sent: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 8:41 AM
Subject: Re: Emus a Model for Dinosaurs?
They are.
JimC
Andreas Johansson wrote:
Aren't neornithine leg mechanics quite different from those of
"classical" theropods?
________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security
tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web,
free AOL Mail and more.