Re: Krzyzanowskisaurus

[David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

> [...] any potential link
> between _Silesaurus_ and revueltosaurs is not discussed.

Despite the unexpected proliferation of Carnian herbivorous archosaurs, 
there doesn't seem to be any potential for such a link. *Revueltosaurus* 
seems to be a crurotarsan pretty immune to doubt, while *Silesaurus* is 
instead _very_ similar to the dinosaurian end of things, if not even inside 
it.

> _Technosaurus_ is deemed "probably ornithischian" because of imbication of
> the tooth crowns; increase in the size of the teeth to the posterior 
> center
> of tooth row; and because the tooth row is not marginal.

Will these 3 characters save it from becoming a sauropodomorph... for 
example?