Re: Krzyzanowskisaurus

[Tim Williams <twilliams_alpha@hotmail.com>]

David Marjanovic wrote:

> > [...] any potential link
> > between _Silesaurus_ and revueltosaurs is not discussed.
>
> Despite the unexpected proliferation of Carnian herbivorous archosaurs, 
> there doesn't seem to be any potential for such a link. *Revueltosaurus* 
> seems to be a crurotarsan pretty immune to doubt, while *Silesaurus* is 
> instead _very_ similar to the dinosaurian end of things, if not even inside 
> it.

Very true.  But what I was alluding to is that, given that _Revueltosaurus_ 
and_Silesaurus_ are both herbivorous non-dinosaurian archosaurs from the 
Late Triassic, it is possible that superficially ornithischian-like teeth 
could come from 'silesaurs', as well as 'revueltosaurs'.

Cheers

Tim