-----Original
Message----- >> With some difficulty, I shall bite my tongue in
restraint, and say: in the studies of ecomorphologies of dinosaurs, carefully
analyzing each new specimen in the context of phylogenetic systematics,
appreciating the awe-full magnificence of the animals...I find the endless
verbiage over the "biggest" "baddest" and slash-and-tear
sandbox iconographic totem meaningless. Does it matter if an individual
theropod skeleton reveals measurements larger than the Chicago Tyrannosaurus? Of course not.<< RIGHT!!! Can
you imagine how many paleontologist actually have this conversation on which
was bigger, stronger? (it’s like comparing dads when we were kids, actually I
never did do that, but you get the idea). Let me give an example: living spotted
hyaenids kill up to 70% (if not more) of what they eat. Many of their killed
prey are snatched by felids. And yet, a hyaenid has a biting power considerably
greater than a lion, and a hyaenid pack is quite capable (and have) of turning
on a lion and killing it in the darkness of an African night.<< One thing is
the ‘cat’ has more appeal to people so they will anoint it with the title ‘King’.
It’s just what humans do…unfortunately… >>Who is king? Neither! ! , since both taxa are, in the main,
hunting females. The subjective adjectives of "one true king" etc.
etc. have no cladistic validity. We should be interested in how the animals lived...during an average 24 hour period,
I doubt if a tyrannosaur walked about, mouth agape, roaring (there were no film
crews about). Ask oneself a question: what was the tyrannosaur doing when not
hunting or eating? << Years ago I
was asked by a local store (the one that originally had the Discovery name but
was sold to the Discovery Channel and has become an over glorified toy store)
about the life of Tyrannosaurus rex. I was going to start the day, with it
walking up, then walking down to a stream and getting a drink of water, then
walking over to a tree and sit under the shade. They didn’t hunt every minute
of the day. (but the talk didn’t really happen, only a few people showed up.
But now that I have made a name for myself…Tracy who?). >>What was a social group of tyrannosaurs like?
Of dromaeosaurs? Of ceratopsians? Etienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, the
"father" of developmental evolutionary concepts, believed that one
can use "actualism" to infer extinct behaviour systems by careful
analyses of ongoing processes. Let me propose an example: Well,
since they don’t have a secondary palate the nasals go right into the mouth and
not the throat, so if it did walk with it’s mouth open IMHO (and I may be
wrong) and open mouth would be the only way for it to breath. Tracy L. Ford P. O. Box 1171 Poway Ca
92074 |