[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: New ref
>
>
>Abstract: The T-J boundary marks a major faunal mass extinction, but
> records of accompanying environmental changes are limited. Paleobotanical
> evidence indicates a fourfold increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide
> concentration and suggests an associated 3 to 4 degree "greenhouse" warming
>
>
> Amazing! I know nothing about botany, let alone palaeobotany, but could
>anyone give me a brief explanation on how they would be able to find out
>something like that from (I presume it was) fossilised plants? I had
>understood that physiologically speaking, it was difficult to really find
>anything out from fossils, especially plants.
>
The number of stomata on leaves depends on carbon dioxide levels; the more
CO2, the fewer stomata. They found a series of well-preserved leaf deposits
that spanned the boundary and counted stomata, finding a dramatic decrease.
They also noted a dramatic change in leaves across the boundary, shifting
from large leaves to smaller ones; smaller ones could survive in hotter
weather. It's a nice little story, well described in Science (and coming
out in this week's New Scientist as well; I'm not sure if it's on the web
site, though).
Jeff Hecht Boston Correspondent New Scientist magazine
525 Auburn St., Auburndale, MA 02466 USA
tel 617-965-3834 fax 617-332-4760 e-mail jhecht@world.std.com
URL: http://www.sff.net/people/Jeff.Hecht/
see New Scientist on the Web: http://www.newscientist.com/
- References:
- New ref
- From: gmbra@cygnus.uwa.edu.au
- Re: New ref
- From: LONEWOLF <s086529@student.uq.edu.au>