Re: [dinosaur] Prehistoric Road Trip,Tiny Teeth, Fearsome Beasts

[aviva <aviva@gmx.us>]

On 7/20/20 1:56 PM, Liz M wrote:
> In case anyone is wondering, I counted the people interviewed in
> episodes 2 and 3 (I canât see episode 1 anymore sadly). I mean why not
> get some numbers to back up the claims of bigotry and sidelining of men?Â
>
> Episode 2: 10 men, 4 women.
>
> Episode 3: 8 men, 7 women.
>
> And there you have it.


That is using statsitics to lie. First of all, I only watched the first
episode, and that was enough. I'm not counting stage hands here. There
was one man given any time in the show at all and only because he was
married to the person being actually interviewed. That is enough to not
waste time watching any other episodes and what you wrote is gross
misrepresentation.


Convienently you skipped episode one.



>
> I didnât count the presenter obviously because well that doesnât make
> sense. Thatâs all Iâm going to say on this. One might say that the
> numbers donât lie.
>

You mean except when the are in the hands of a radical protagonist who
is doing her best to misrepresent the facts?



>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 20 Jul 2020, at 18:50, Anthony <keenir@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ï
>>
>> >>> it is to show something of process of discovery being made and the
>> >>> people making it in the places she grew up. Full stop.
>> >
>> > >umm, that is not what the show is about, by your own admission.ÂÂ
>> It was
>> > >about stuffing as many white women as possible into a paleo
>> documentary.
>>
>> >Just to clarifyâ are you honestly aggrieved that there were too many
>> paleontologists in a paleontology documentary?
>> >Iâve heard a lot of weird arguments over the years, but thatâs a new
>> one.
>> >âMBH
>>
>> *nods*
>> Ranks up there with some folks earlier in this conversation thread
>> being upset that a documentary series about the fossil history of a
>> few neighboring states, would opt to talk with the paleontologists
>> who work in those states.
>>