| In case anyone is wondering, I counted the people interviewed in episodes 2 and 3 (I canât see episode 1 anymore sadly). I mean why not get some numbers to back up the claims of bigotry and sidelining of men?
Episode 2: 10 men, 4 women.
Episode 3: 8 men, 7 women.
And there you have it.
I didnât count the presenter obviously because well that doesnât make sense. Thatâs all Iâm going to say on this. One might say that the numbers donât lie.
Sent from my iPhone On 20 Jul 2020, at 18:50, Anthony <keenir@hotmail.com> wrote:
ï
>>> it is to show something of process of discovery being made and the
>>> people making it in the places she grew up. Full stop.
>
> >umm, that is not what the show is about, by your own admission. It was
> >about stuffing as many white women as possible into a paleo documentary.
>Just to clarifyâ are you honestly aggrieved that there were too many paleontologists in a paleontology documentary?
>Iâve heard a lot of weird arguments over the years, but thatâs a new one.
>âMBH
*nods*
Ranks up there with some folks earlier in this conversation thread being upset that a documentary series about the fossil history of a few neighboring states, would opt to talk with the paleontologists who work in those states.
|