-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Taylor <
sauropoda@gmail.com>
To: Dann Pigdon <
dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Cc: dinosaur-l <
dinosaur-l@usc.edu>
Sent: Thu, Oct 10, 2019 5:57 pm
Subject: Re: [dinosaur] Submerged sauropods
They would likely not have been able to inspire when their lungs were more than a meter below the surface of the water â at least, that's the conclusion from Kermack.
(I wonder how far below the surface the lungs of big whales are.)
-- Mike.
On Thu, Oct 10th, 2019 at 11:22 PM, Mike Taylor <sauropoda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Kermack's reasoning is rock-solid, and there is essentially no possibility
> of snorkelling sauropods. As Kermack himself noted in the closing words of
> his paper, "If the sauropods were, in fact, aquatic, they probably lived
> much the same sort of life as the present-day Hippopotamus, swimming and
> diving in the water, and walking along the bottom. To breathe, however,
> they would have needed to raise their body nearly, if not quite, to the
> surface."
>
> -- Mike.
It makes you wonder how elasmosaurids or tanystropheids managed to breathe. Would they have needed
to surface completely with their bodies held horizontal?
--
Dann Pigdon