[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: [dinosaur] Submerged sauropods



They would likely not have been able to inspire when their lungs were more than a meter below the surface of the water â at least, that's the conclusion from Kermack.

(I wonder how far below the surface the lungs of big whales are.)

-- Mike.


On Thu, 10 Oct 2019 at 22:49, Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 10th, 2019 at 11:22 PM, Mike Taylor <sauropoda@gmail.com> wrote:

> Kermack's reasoning is rock-solid, and there is essentially no possibility
> of snorkelling sauropods. As Kermack himself noted in the closing words of
> his paper, "If the sauropods were, in fact, aquatic, they probably lived
> much the same sort of life as the present-day Hippopotamus, swimming and
> diving in the water, and walking along the bottom. To breathe, however,
> they would have needed to raise their body nearly, if not quite, to the
> surface."
>
> -- Mike.

It makes you wonder how elasmosaurids or tanystropheids managed to breathe. Would they have needed
to surface completely with their bodies held horizontal?

--
Dann Pigdon