[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Burning sauropod not arson

To: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Subject: Re: Burning sauropod not arson
From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 16:35:12 -0600
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: "dinosaur@usc.edu" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <1286487961.4cae3f994eb1c@webmail.chariot.com.au>
References: <4CADBBD3.5000107@easilink.com> <1286487961.4cae3f994eb1c@webmail.chariot.com.au>
Reply-to: rtravsky@uwyo.edu
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu


On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Dann Pigdon wrote:

On Thu, Oct 7th, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com> wrote:

  It appears that the fire that burned and destroyed the "life-size"
Ultrasauros sculpture was the result of an electrical problem and not
arson as originally reported.  Details may be gleaned at

http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Dino-fire-report-rules-out.6569778.jp


I'm still not ruling out a small bolide strike...


Darn you sir, darn you, I almost sprayed coffee on that one...

References:
- Burning sauropod not arson
  - From: Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com>
- Re: Burning sauropod not arson
  - From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Burning sauropod not arson
Next by Date: RE: Publication and the Code
Previous by thread: Re: Burning sauropod not arson
Next by thread: ICZN - another use of the code
Indexes: