[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Burning sauropod not arson

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Burning sauropod not arson
From: Dann Pigdon <dannj@alphalink.com.au>
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2010 08:46:01 +1100
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <4CADBBD3.5000107@easilink.com>
References: <4CADBBD3.5000107@easilink.com>
Reply-to: dannj@alphalink.com.au
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Thu, Oct 7th, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com> wrote:

>   It appears that the fire that burned and destroyed the "life-size" 
> Ultrasauros sculpture was the result of an electrical problem and not 
> arson as originally reported.  Details may be gleaned at
> 
> http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/newshome/Dino-fire-report-rules-out.6569778.jp

I'm still not ruling out a small bolide strike...

-- 
_____________________________________________________________

Dann Pigdon
Spatial Data Analyst               Australian Dinosaurs
Melbourne, Australia               http://home.alphalink.com.au/~dannj
_____________________________________________________________

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Burning sauropod not arson
  - From: "Richard W. Travsky" <rtravsky@uwyo.edu>

References:
- Burning sauropod not arson
  - From: Dan Chure <danchure@easilink.com>

Prev by Date: RE: Publication and the Code
Next by Date: Re: Burning sauropod not arson
Previous by thread: Burning sauropod not arson
Next by thread: Re: Burning sauropod not arson
Indexes: