Re: No dinosaur feathers? Say what?

[David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

> Although I'm don't care much for "success gurus" like Mr. Chopra, I think 
> what he means in this case is "the VERY FIRST feathered dinosaur" has yet 
> to be found .

No, from the context it's clear he does not mean the oldest one, but the 
first to be discovered. He mentions "*Archaeoraptor*" as the only candidate 
so far (and then mentions it was a fake, but not that the hindlimbs and tail 
belong to *Microraptor* _and preserve feathers, too_.

But it's normal for Chopra to talk about things he doesn't actually know 
anything about. Here is the smackdown.
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/11/flaunting_ignorance.php