[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: gigantism as liability

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: gigantism as liability
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:18:57 +0100
References: <18693.41490.360534.780942@localhost.localdomain> <284731.10712.qm@web63802.mail.re1.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

----- Original Message ----- From: "john bois" <jbois@verizon.net> Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2008 1:32 AM

So interesting...I wonder if we still posses silenced shell-making genes?

In any case, we possess broken genes (pseudogenes) for three yolk proteins. http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/03/reproductive_history_writ_in_t.php (see also the first half of comment 59)

Prev by Date: Gobiceratops minutus, a new bagaceratopid
Next by Date: Steiner (1934)
Previous by thread: Re: gigantism as liability
Next by thread: Re: gigantism as liability
Indexes: