[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Maidment & Wei, 2006



I enjoyed reading Maidment & Wei 2006, Maidment, Wei & Norman 2006 and Maidment, Norman and Barrett and Upchurch 2008 but sorry to say I think a lot of their conclusions are rubbish. Good example of what happens when you blindly apply a meth[od]ology to the fossil record. Poor stegosaurs got blitzkreiged. Suggest that everyone read G.S. Paul's 2008 article on iguanodonts for a more balanced approach to interpreting the fossil record.

Could you elaborate, please?

BTW, Krieg with ie (pronounced "ee").