[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)

To: jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net>
Subject: Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 15:05:18 -0300
Cc: dinosaur@usc.edu
In-reply-to: <008b01c8d6c3$9e499b90$dd310741@lela>
References: <8b3c185c0806241353n3efb6f85tb582e5613f403f32@mail.gmail.com> <1D0A75EB-424A-11DD-8D1F-000393BA24D4@jhmi.edu>
Reply-to: rmtakata@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 10:01 AM, jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Not at all.  You are ignoring the vertical translation of the stagnation
> line that is located just below the leading edge nose (for a wing that is
> lifting upward).

One could *invert* the curvature...

> but Bernoulli works if you want to put the effort into it.

Not to create the most of the lift (perhaps in some special circumstances).

[]s,

Roberto Takata

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
  - From: Mike Habib <habib@jhmi.edu>
- early tetrapod
  - From: Erik Boehm <erikboehm07@yahoo.com>

References:
- Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
  - From: Roberto Takata <rmtakata@gmail.com>
- Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
  - From: Michael Habib <mhabib5@jhmi.edu>
- Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
  - From: jrc <jrccea@bellsouth.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Fw: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
Next by Date: Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
Previous by thread: Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
Next by thread: Re: Archie a non-flyer? (was:Re: origin of bats/reply 2 to TMK)
Indexes: