William Parker wrote:
Currently there technically is no such thing as a "revueltosaur". Hopefully, this will be fixed sometime soon with an analysis...
Yes, true. Same for "silesaur".
This is the paper that got the ball rolling...
Jamie Stearns wrote:
Teratosaurus, as I recall, was thought to be a large Triassic theropod, but was later found to be a
chimera of Plateosaurus and something else.
Cheers
Tim