Currently there technically is no such thing as a "revueltosaur".
Hopefully, this will be fixed sometime soon with an analysis...
The new paper mentioned in a previous post covers more taxa that we no
longer consider dinosaurian...
************************************************************************
Bill Parker
Vertebrate Paleontologist
Division of Resource Management
Petrified Forest National Park
P.O. Box 2217
1 Park Road
Petrified Forest, AZ 86028
(928) 524-6228 x262
Jamie Stearns
<stearns5@cox.net To: dinosaur@usc.edu
> cc: (bcc: William
Parker/PEFO/NPS)
Sent by: Subject: Re: Dinosaur a
tecnical term; 3 specifically
owner-DINOSAUR@us
c.edu
10/26/2006 06:01
PM AST
Please respond to
stearns5
Revueltosaurs were mostly tooth taxa identified as basal ornithischians
until a better skeletal find of Revueltosaurus was made, showing it to
actually be some type of herbivorous crocodilian and casting doubt on other
presumed Triassic ornithischians known only from teeth.
Teratosaurus, as I recall, was thought to be a large Triassic theropod, but
was later found to be a chimera of Plateosaurus and something else.
I really have no idea about Hallopus.