Re: Doswellia

[Phil Bigelow <bigelowp@juno.com>]

Although it is considered to be a "derived Rauisuchian",  I'll bet that
Dozy will turn out to be a weird dead end of the basal archosauromorphs.

This quote was interesting:

" At least one, and perhaps two, new Doswellia papers are said to be in
process,..."

There must be new material now available.

<pb>
--

On Thu, 04 May 2006 21:19:13 +0200 David Marjanovic
<david.marjanovic@gmx.at> writes:
> > 
>
http://www.palaeos.com/Vertebrates/Units/270Archosauromorpha/270.700.html
> 
> I just checked this out... and it says *Doswellia* has pterygoid 
> teeth. This 
> ought to mean that it is not a crown-group archosaur. But beyond 
> that... it 
> certainly doesn't help that everything in front of the pterygoids is 
> 
> missing... 
>