[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Defining crocodiles as "fish"... :-)



What you all think about this?

Clonal Origin and Evolution of a Transmissible Cancer
http://www.cell.com/content/article/fulltext?uid=PIIS0092867406009123

CTVT (canine transmissible venereal tumor) is a new vertebrate
bauplaun - with no vertebra at all! Phylogenetically it is a dog
(Canis lupus)... could we call it a dog?

[]s,

Roberto Takata

On 8/23/06, David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at> wrote:
> ...which is why it is good that "fish" is not, in fact, defined
> phylogenetically.

If it were defined as "Actinopterygii", that would be a good thing! People
might stop serving ray as "fish"...

Have you eaten ray wings? I have (when there was nothing better in the
university cafeteria here). Slimy and fibrous at the same time. It's
incredible. The monophyly of Osteichthyes becomes patently obvious this way.