[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Defining crocodiles as "fish"... :-)



...which is why it is good that "fish" is not, in fact, defined
phylogenetically.

If it were defined as "Actinopterygii", that would be a good thing! People might stop serving ray as "fish"...


Have you eaten ray wings? I have (when there was nothing better in the university cafeteria here). Slimy and fibrous at the same time. It's incredible. The monophyly of Osteichthyes becomes patently obvious this way.