[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't first, after all)

To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't first, after all)
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:29:31 +0100
References: <194333.785072-23724-743033131-1075810481@seznam.cz>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> Also, the name Megalosaurus he erected for his theropod was already used
as a valid scientific name for one genus of recent lizzard! The name was
used in 1822 by proff. Parkinson.

What! Is *Megalosaurus* really preoccupied!?!
(I'd love it. :-) )

References:
- G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't first, after all)
  - From: Vladimír Socha <Seismosaurus@seznam.cz>

Prev by Date: G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't first, after all)
Next by Date: RE: G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't fir st, after all)
Previous by thread: G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't first, after all)
Next by thread: RE: G. A. Mantell would be 214 today (and why Buckland wasn't fir st, after all)
Indexes: