[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Cretaceous taeniodont

To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:58:23 +0200
References: <200404051748.i35Hm0Cj012048@condor.psych.ucsb.edu> <001501c41b3a$0d109460$0300a8c0@IPC> <Pine.OSF.4.51.0404051504340.30869@marlowe.umd.edu> <004a01c41b43$4a4e49e0$0300a8c0@IPC> <006401c41b4b$b9f95980$cecd90d4@yourynxza5usuu>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> Purely based upon the info I've got, I'd be surprised if Repenomamus
> could've got beyond 50cm, and I suspect that length is generous.

I've remembered my own length estimate (onlist, years ago), which was pretty
flawed... however, skull or dentary length, I forgot, is 11 cm, and the
whole beast is bigger than *Gobiconodon* which is itself one of the many
animals that have been proclaimed "biggest Mesozoic mammal".

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: "K and T Dykes" <ktdykes@arcor.de>

References:
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: Mickey Rowe <rowe@psych.ucsb.edu>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: John Bois <jbois@umd5.umd.edu>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
- Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
  - From: "K and T Dykes" <ktdykes@arcor.de>

Prev by Date: Re: Mesozoic snow
Next by Date: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Previous by thread: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Next by thread: Re: Cretaceous taeniodont
Indexes: