[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
NEW DATA ON SCELIDOSAURUS
On Sunday 9th June Channel 4 TV here in the UK
broadcast the pilot episode of 'Dinosaur Detectives', a
(planned) series in which a group of palaeontologists and
geologists march around the country investigating alleged
unsolved palaeontological mysteries. The pilot concerned a
recently discovered _Scelidosaurus_ specimen currently
being prepped by David Sole (a well known Dorset
collector and preparator). This specimen is familiar to most
British fossil collectors, palaeontologists etc, but this is the
first time it has been given any serious hype. Incidentally,
this specimen is not the same as the juvenile (with skin) at
Bristol, nor the other juvenile figured in David Lambert's
_Ultimate Dinosaur Book_ (and Carpenter 2001).
The programme featured the usual shots of people walking
on the beach, driving land rovers, stepping out of land
rovers and leaning on land rovers etc and followed the
adventures of Drs Dave Martill, Sarah Gabbott and
someone else whose name I can't recall (he was a
sedimentologist) as they investigated the Lower Jurassic
geology of Lyme Regis, Dorset. Personally I found the
programme pretty dull (it mostly concentrated on
sedimentology, environment of deposition etc and did not
focus that much on the dinosaur) but it seems to have gone
down pretty well. As usual the CG animation and artwork
was poor.
My belated reason for writing this email is that the new
_Scelidosaurus_ specimen is absolutely unbelievable: more
complete than the type and with a slew of startling new
features. Hopefully more will appear on it soon, but for
those of you who will not have seen the programme, here
are some highlights.
The specimen is big (at least on par with, and maybe bigger
than, the holotype), preserved in a nodule and fully
articulated, with all the armour in-situ. As in the type
(strangely), the snout rostral to the ant fenestra is missing. It
has tricorns but also has curving caudolateral bony horns on
the squamosals (do not have my copy of Blows 2001 to
hand and haven't allocated his terminology to memory). I
could not see a lateral scute on the lower jaw. I am told that
cervical half-rings are preserved but I was unable to see
these. Several scute rows are preserved on the side of the
body: they appear larger and more closely-packed than in
the type, and scute rows also run down _all_ of the limbs.
Two rows run down the hindlimbs; one lateral, the other
cranial. On the tibia at least, the scutes are not conical but
actually hooked, with the hook pointing distally. Tracy has
pointed out that, in contrast to most depictions,
_Scutellosaurus lawleri_ has a double row of scutes along
the dorsal midline. Does _Scelidosaurus_ also have a
double row, as opposed to the single row depicted by Greg
Paul? The answer is yes and furthermore, there is also a
symmetrical double row of scutes along the ventral midline
of the tail. This was determined by CT-scanning. In cross-
section the tail therefore has four scute rows. Sorry Jim, this
shows your suggestion of rotated lateral polacanthid-like
tail scutes is probably incorrect:)
Given that this animal is altogether a spikier, more armour-
clad version of the holotype, it might be a male of the same
species. The alternative is that it's a new species, and both
ideas were mentioned by Dave during the programme. One
final note, the specimen is currently in a private collection.
There are plans for it to be purchased by a museum
however.
We leave this weekend for our _Leedsichthys_ dig in
Peterborough. Alan Dawn told me that the same quarry also
contains at least one plesiosaur and one ichthyosaur, so if
the fish isn't so good at least we have something else to play
with;)
Darren Naish
School of Earth & Environmental Sciences
University of Portsmouth
Burnaby Building
Burnaby Road email:
darren.naish@port.ac.uk
Portsmouth UK tel: 023 92846045
PO1 3QL www.palaeobiology.co.uk