[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Neogondwana and Epitheria




Extrapolating the mammal results to birds is a tricky business, beyond the general "southern refuge" at K-T. Even for mammals, I am not completely convinced that Afrotheria is necessarily the most basal group. The Xenarthrans of Neogondwana have been classified separately from all other living mammals (epitheres) for quite some time, and it still seems possible to me that xenarthrans paraphyletically gave rise to both afrotherians and boreoeutherians, either separately (more likely?) or as a single epitherian clade (epitherian synapomorphies have always been rather "iffy" in my view, but who knows).
So I wouldn't jump too hastily on this new "Afrotheria came first" view (they may have instead been second). And even if afrotherians are basal to xenarthrans, that doesn't mean the birds would necessarily show the exact same pattern in Gondwanan distribution. But Gondwana (as a whole) seems to have clearly emerged as the main refuge for mammals and birds at K-T, so it is not surprising that bird and mammal paleontologists are paying more attention to the southern hemisphere (and for scientific reasons other than just the fact that it was relatively neglected for so long).
------ Ken Kinman



_________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com