[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Neogondwana and Epitheria
Extrapolating the mammal results to birds is a tricky business, beyond
the general "southern refuge" at K-T. Even for mammals, I am not completely
convinced that Afrotheria is necessarily the most basal group. The
Xenarthrans of Neogondwana have been classified separately from all other
living mammals (epitheres) for quite some time, and it still seems possible
to me that xenarthrans paraphyletically gave rise to both afrotherians and
boreoeutherians, either separately (more likely?) or as a single epitherian
clade (epitherian synapomorphies have always been rather "iffy" in my view,
but who knows).
So I wouldn't jump too hastily on this new "Afrotheria came first" view
(they may have instead been second). And even if afrotherians are basal to
xenarthrans, that doesn't mean the birds would necessarily show the exact
same pattern in Gondwanan distribution. But Gondwana (as a whole) seems to
have clearly emerged as the main refuge for mammals and birds at K-T, so it
is not surprising that bird and mammal paleontologists are paying more
attention to the southern hemisphere (and for scientific reasons other than
just the fact that it was relatively neglected for so long).
------ Ken Kinman
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com