[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Any one up for fossil ID?

To: "The Dinosaur Mailing List" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Any one up for fossil ID?
From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 13:39:42 +0100
References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020122084625.009ee730@localhost>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu

> Serious: probably something due to erosion. I may be wrong (after all I am
> looking only to the photos)  but don't think it is a fossil. Look at the
> "base" with inserts of different lithology.

Maybe (low-quality) natural casts of fossils? (Is there the word Steinkern
in English usage?)
Judging from its surface, the one on the left looks somewhat like an eroded
conglomerate, but its shape is probably difficult to produce that way.

References:
- Re: Any one up for fossil ID?
  - From: Silvio Renesto <renesto@mailserver.unimi.it>

Prev by Date: INFO on Centrosaurines measurements
Next by Date: Re: Any one up for fossil ID?
Previous by thread: Re: Any one up for fossil ID?
Next by thread: Re: Any one up for fossil ID?
Indexes: