Re: Any one up for fossil ID?

["Øyvind M. Padron" <gorgosaur@hotmail.com>]

Silvio Ernesto wrote:
> Serious: probably something due to erosion. I may be wrong (after all I am
> looking only to the photos)  but don't think it is a fossil. Look at the
> "base" with inserts of different lithology.

Defining these kind of fragmental evidence upon photographs may be a pretty 
impossible task, but I think they look like fossils.

See picture one, it looks like some strange claw, and there's even a nice 
claw base in the end, for muscle attachments and all.
The next pic looks like a tooth, low and seemingly unserrated.

But I don't dare to speculate anything further within the Dinosauria.

-Øyvind M. Padron
|
|-Amateur Palæontologist
|-PaleoArtist
|
|-For another dinosaur website try:
  |-http://the_dinosauria.tripod.com


_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com