(shortened)
Amniota is defined otherwise (as a node,
BTW), and so is Reptilia:
_____________________Diadectomorpha
|
unnamed_|
___________Theropsida = Synapsida
|
|
|_Amniota_|
_Anapsida
|
|
|_Sauropsida
= Reptilia = Eureptilia_|
|
|_Romeriida
"Unnamed" is called "Amniotiformes" in http://dinosauricon.com/taxa/tetrapoda.html (good
idea) and Stegocephali by Laurin & Reisz (I hate them for that). Sauropsida
is stem-based, Reptilia and Eureptilia have (AFAIK different) node-based
definitions, so they are the same only in currently known contents.
Consensus extends quite far into Ther- and
Sauropsida.
Sure it can. Pisces has been dismissed.
:-)
One more reason not to use it.
:-)
That was long before phylogenetic
taxonomy... anyway, he didn't consider monotremes and birds reptiles and
nevertheless called their eggs amniotic. Romer has done great deeds, and it was
a good idea by the SVP to name a prize after him, but there's no need to make a
demi-god of him. :-)
|