[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: dino fossils above human's
Come on, guys, I figured that when I asked for published info the
creationists were going to back down or make excuses. They always do.
Nothing was going to be forthcoming and I really didn't think I'd be
writing this or any more messages pertaining to this subject. Let's drop
it. OK?
Steve
Stephen Faust smfaust@edisto.cofc.edu
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Stanley Friesen wrote:
> At 01:06 AM 3/13/98 -0500, Stephen Faust wrote:
> >What published information is there on these skulls? Would
> >appreciate references and dates.
> >
> They are not skulls at all. They are geological artifacts, probably
> concretions (though I have not seen them, so I could be wrong on that).
> They are so uninteresting to geologists, that I suspect little has been
> published, at least not in refereed journals.
>
> [In general, concretions are only interesting if they *contain* fossils].
>
> --------------
> May the peace of God be with you. sarima@ix.netcom.com
> sfriesen@netlock.com
>
>