Re: dino fossils above human's

[Richard Keatinge <richard@keatinge.demon.co.uk>]

In article <Pine.OSF.3.96.980313010454.28638D-100000@edisto.cofc.edu>,
Stephen Faust <smfaust@edisto.cofc.edu> writes
>What published information is there on these skulls? 

Oh shoot, not here *please*! Try 

http://www.sunlink.net/~edconrad for the loony claims and 

http://geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/talk_origins.html for some thorough
rebuttal by someone who, unlike Ed, is sane, knows what a rock looks
like and how to take pictures of it, and is consistently polite and
constructive (widely and only half-jokingly called Saint Andrew).  And
try the USENET group talk.origins if you want to discuss fruitcake ideas
like this and don't mind having their weaknesses - er - pointed out.  

>Would appreciate
>references and dates.

If you can get anything sensible out of Ed, do please post it in
talk.origins, OK?  Be warned, though, almost all of the distinguished
scientists he quotes as supporting his claims are dead.  Do you want to
join them?

>
>Steve
>
>Stephen Faust                  smfaust@edisto.cofc.edu
>
>On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Joe Moro wrote:
>
>> 
>> >My (!)scripture teacher said something about dinosaur remains being
>> >found ABOVE human remains.  Is this true?

No.  If your scripture teacher told you this, that person is either
lying (unlikely) or has believed someone else's lies (try an AltaVista
search for "creation science" for some of the possible sources).  

In either case I would question the credibility and competence of your
scripture teacher.  

>> 
>> 
>> Well, yes and no. There are supposed fossilized human skulls from the
>> Carboniferous period (before dinosaurs). I have seen many photos, and they
>> do look like human skulls. There was recently a long thread about 'Ed
>> Conrad' (the nickname for the 1st skull found) at talk.origins.
>> -Joe

And take this ELSEWHERE, PLEASE!

-- 
Richard Keatinge 

homepage http://www.keatinge.demon.co.uk