>From The Theropod Database-
unnamed baryonychine (Hone et al., 2010)
Middle Santonian, Late Cretaceous Majiacun Formation, Henan, China Material- (XMDFEC V0010) tooth (52x15x9 mm) Reference- Hone, Xu and Wang. 2010. A probable baryonychine (Theropoda: Spinosauridae) tooth from the Upper Cretaceous of Henan Province, China. Vertebrata PalAsiatica. 48, 19-26.
unnamed Baryonychinae (Candeiro, Abranches, Abrantes, Avilla, Martins, Moreira, Torres and Bergqvist, 2004)
Turonian-Santonian, Late Cretaceous Adamantina Formation of the Bauru Group, Brazil Material- (UFRJ-DG 354-Rd) tooth (8.6x5.6x? mm) (UFRJ-DG 372-Rd) tooth (18.9x10.6x? mm) Comments- These were assigned to Spinosauridae by Candeiro et al. (2004), but reassigned to Theropoda indet. by Candeiro et al. (2006) because other theropods also have serrationless teeth. However, their round cross section, lack of recurvature and present but tiny serrations (contra Candeiro et al., 2006) indicates they are baryonychine spinosaurids. References- Candeiro, Abranches, Abrantes, Avilla, Martins, Moreira, Torres and Bergqvist, 2004. Dinosaur remains from western Sao Paulo State, Brazil (Bauru Basin, Adamantina Formation, Late Cretaceous). Journal of South American Earth Sciences. 18, 1-10. Candeiro, Martinelli, Avilla and Rich, 2006. Tetrapods from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian-Maastrichtian) Bauru Group of Brazil: A reappraisal. Cretaceous Research. 27, 923-946. Spinosaurus Stromer, 1915 = Sigilmassasaurus Russell, 1996 S. aegyptiacus Stromer, 1915 = Sigilmassasaurus brevicollis Russell, 1996 = Spinosaurus marocannus Russell, 1996 Turonian-Santonian, Late Cretaceous Turkana Grits, Kenya ? material (Weishampel, 1990) Reference- Weishampel, 1990. Dinosaurian distribution. In Weishampel, Dodson and Osmolska (eds.). The Dinosauria. University of California Press, Berkeley. 63-139. Since African latest Cretaceous records are so terrible, I wouldn't be surprised if we find spinosaurids were still there. Still it is odd that our last records are from the Santonian in three different continents, and Brazil and China DO have good latest Cretaceous records. Is there a possibility they did evolve to be basically shoreline animals, so would no longer be expected in the terrestrial formations where we find titanosaurs and abelisaurs? Are there any good shoreline formations from e.g. Campanian-Maastrichtian South America?
Mickey Mortimer
From: dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu <dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu> on behalf of Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 10:41 PM To: dinosaur-l@usc.edu <dinosaur-l@usc.edu> Subject: Re: [dinosaur] Spinosaurus tail propelled swimming locomotion It goes without saying that this is a spectacular discovery. A trivial observation: not only is _Spinosaurus_ among the largest known theropods (arguably, *the* largest known theropod), it is also now the largest known aquatic dinosaur. It blows the
largest aquatic birds (hesperornithids, stem-penguins, plotopterids, etc) out of the water, by orders of magnitude.
I can't be the only person to wonder that, if spinosaurids continued into the latest Cretaceous, would they have become even more specialized for aquatic habits, similar to mosasaurs or thalattosuchians? At the moment this is pure speculation; to my knowledge,
there is currently no evidence of post-Cenomanian spinosaurids.
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 1:38 AM Ben Creisler <bcreisler@gmail.com> wrote:
|