Re: [dinosaur] Earliest Tyrannida from Oligocene of France [...]

[David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>]

> I think it is not named as what would need to become a holotype is in a 
> private collection.

Oh! I overlooked that.

But in that case, why were they allowed to publish at all? If access to the 
specimen _is_ guaranteed, that's enough to name the taxon; if not, then all the 
other claims in the paper can't be tested either, and the whole paper is 
useless to science...?