Reference 44, the description of
Carnufex published in the same journal (in 2015),
is registered. Too bad, actually, because the way
Art. 32.5 is worded, that appears to remove any possibility of correcting the name: despite the paper's confident assertion that that's the Latin for "butcher", that's actually carn
ifex, and the form with u (which would hardly have been considered pronounceable) does not occur at all in the one online dictionary I've found (
Lewis & Short through perseus.tufts.edu) – somebody must have copied a typo.
Concerning the actual topic, the authors discuss and refute the possibility that the bipedal tracks could be swim tracks. Consistently, the imprints show the entire foot in great detail, while swim tracks would be expected to consist mainly of claw scratches.