I personally like *Antarctosaurus*. Of course, it's best suited for a beast from Antarctica itself, though perhaps from the perspective of a Cretaceous animal the differences between South America and Antarctica are not very significant.
Incidentally, another example of the place-name mismatch in dinosaur taxonomy is *Magyarosaurus*, named by Nopcsa back when Transylvania was part of Hungary (now Romania).
Thomas Yazbeck
From: dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu <dinosaur-l-request@mymaillists.usc.edu> on behalf of Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, July 26, 2020 11:56 PM To: dinosaur-l@usc.edu <dinosaur-l@usc.edu> Subject: Re: [dinosaur] Coining names This exchange is better suited to this thread...
Thomas Yazbeck <yazbeckt@msu.edu> wrote:
> I should say I wasn't making a negative judgement when I speculated a nationalist motivation for *Argentinosaurus*. Although it could never happen thanks to local geology, I would love to name a dinosaur after my proud home
> town or home state (Detroit, Michigan). But as Justin says, it's sort of a cheap way of getting a name. In my opinion, the best spot for a placename is in the specific epithet, which makes it a bit less awkward if a new species of,
> say, *Argentinosaurus* was discovered in Brazil or Mexico or something, and allows for more creativity in the generic epithet.
One of the dangers of naming a genus after the nation in which it was discovered is that national boundaries can sometimes change. The only dinosaur genus I'm aware of this happening to is _Nipponosaurus_ (Nippon = Japan), discovered on Sakhalin Island
- part of Japan at the time, but which changed hands after the Second World War (and is now part of the Russian Federation).
The genus name _Antarctosaurus_ sounds inappropriate - the dinosaur was found in Argentina, not Antarctica. But the Antarcto- part is derived from anti(-), as in 'opposite', and -arctos, meaning 'north' - so _Antarctosaurus_ literally means "opposite-to-north
lizard" (so essentially means "southern lizard"). Huene could have done better.
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 10:56 AM Thomas Richard Holtz <tholtz@umd.edu> wrote:
|