[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

[dinosaur] Mesenosaurus efremovi, new synapsid species from Oklahoma + Metoposaurus cranial sutures



Ben Creisler
bcreisler@gmail.com

New papers:

Free pdf:

Sigi Maho, Bryan M. Gee and Robert R. Reisz (2019)
A new varanopid synapsid from the early Permian of Oklahoma and the evolutionary stasis in this clade.
Royal Society Open Science 6(10): 191297
doi: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.191297
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rsos.191297
Free pdf:
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsos.191297


Varanopids are a basal clade of small- to medium-sized non-therapsid synapsids, whose range extends from the late Pennsylvanian to the late middle Permian, and are found in North America, Russia, Europe and South Africa. The greatest varanopid diversity is observed at the fossiliferous cave deposits near Richards Spur, Oklahoma, well known for the preservation of a complex early Permian upland community. Two previously described varanopids, Mycterosaurus and Varanops, are known only from fragmentary disarticulated material at Richards Spur. A third putative varanopid, Basicranodon fortsillensis, represented by a partial parasphenoid, has been synonymized with Mycterosaurus longiceps. This study reports on a new varanopid taxon, represented by substantially more complete material, including three nearly complete skulls. Such comprehensive cranial material allows for a detailed study of the taxon and its relationship to other varanopids. This new varanopid bears great morphological similarity to Mesenosaurus romeri from the middle Permian Mezen River Basin of northern Russia. Phylogenetic analysis recovers a sister relationship between this taxon and Me. romeri. This relationship, in conjunction with a detailed morphological comparison, supports the placement of this taxon within Mesenosaurus, as a new species, Me. efremovi. These results reveal an unexpected extension of the geographical and temporal range of Mesenosaurus, contributing to our understanding of varanopid dispersal. The extended persistence of this basal clade of predatory synapsids, underscored by the apparent evolutionary stasis of this genus, is unusual among Palaeozoic tetrapods. This phenomenon implies an exceptionally high degree of extended ecological resilience across major faunal and environmental transitions.

Footnotes
Electronic supplementary material is available online at
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4693241.

=====

(pay-walled)

Kamil Gruntmejer, ÂDorota KonietzkoâMeier, ÂJordi MarcÃâNoguÃ, ÂAdam Bodzioch & Josep Fortuny (2019)
Cranial suture biomechanics in Metoposaurus krasiejowensis (Temnospondyli, Stereospondyli) from the upper Triassic of Poland.
Journal of Morphology (advance online publication)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.21070
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jmor.21070


Cranial sutures connect adjacent bones of the skull and play an important role in the absorption of stresses that may occur during different activities. The Late Triassic temnospondyl amphibian Metoposaurus krasiejowensis has been extensively studied over the years in terms of skull biomechanics, but without a detailed description of the function of cranial sutures. In the present study, 34 thin sections of cranial sutures were examined in order to determine their histovariability and interpret their biomechanical role in the skull. The histological model was compared with threeâdimensionalâfinite element analysis (FEA) simulations of the skull under bilateral and lateral biting as well as skullâraising loads for maximum and minimum principal stress. Histologically, only two sutural morphologies were recognised in the skull of Metoposaurus: interdigitated sutures (commonly associated with compressive stresses) are dominant along the entire length of the skull roof and palate; tongueâandâgroove sutures (commonly associated with tensile stresses) are present across the maxilla. FEA shows a much more complex picture of stress type and distribution than predicted by sutures. Common to both methods is a predominance of compressive stresses which act on the skull during biting. The methods predict different stress regimes during biting in the posterior part of the skull: where histological analysis suggests compression, FEA predicts tension. For lateral biting and skull raising, histological and digital reconstructions show similar general patterns but with some variations.

==

Virus-free. www.avg.com