Haley D. OâBrien, Leigha M. Lynch, Kent A. Vliet, John Brueggen, Gregory M. Erickson & Paul M. Gignac (2019)
Crocodylian Head Width Allometry and Phylogenetic Prediction of Body Size in Extinct Suchians.Â
Integrative Organismal Biology, obz006,
Body size and body-size shifts broadly impact life-history parameters of all animals, which has made accurate body-size estimates for extinct taxa an important component of understanding their paleobiology. Among extinct crocodylians and their precursors (e.g., suchians), several methods have been developed to predict body size from suites of hard-tissue proxies. Nevertheless, many have limited applications due to the disparity of some major suchian groups and biases in the fossil record. Here, we test the utility of head width as a broadly applicable body-size estimator in living and fossil suchians. We use a dataset of sexually mature male and female individuals (nâ=â76) from a comprehensive sample of extant suchian species encompassing nearly all known taxa (nâ=â22) to develop a Bayesian phylogenetic model for predicting three conventional metrics for size: body mass, snout-vent length, and total length. We then use the model to estimate size parameters for a select series of extinct suchians with known phylogenetic affinity (Montsechosuchus, Diplocynodon, and Sarcosuchus). We then compare our results to sizes reported in the literature to exemplify the utility of our approach for a broad array of fossil suchians. Our results show that head width is highly correlated with all other metrics (all R2 â 0.85) and is commensurate with femoral dimensions for its reliably as a body-size predictor. We provide the R code in order to enable other researchers to employ the model in their own research.
======
Not yet mentioned:
Free pdf:
S. B. Crofts, R. Shehata & B. Flammang (2019)
Flexibility of heterocercal tails: what can the functional morphology of shark tails tell us about ichthyosaur swimming?Â
Integrative Organismal Biology, obz002
The similarities between ichthyosaurs and sharks are a text-book example of convergence, and similarities in tail morphology have led many to theorize that they had similar swimming styles. The variation of ichthyosaur tail shapes is encompassed within the diversity of shark families. In particular early ichthyosaurs have asymmetrical tails like the heterocercal tails of carcharhinid sharks, while later occurring ichthyosaurs have lunate tails similar to those of lamnid sharks. Because it is not possible to measure ichthyosaur tail function, the goal of this study is to measure and compare the flexibility and stiffness of lunate and heterocercal shark tails, and to measure skeletal and connective tissue features that may affect tail flexibility. We measured flexibility in 10 species, and focused on five species in particular, for dissection: one pelagic and one bottom-associated individual from each order, plus the common thresher shark (Alopias vulpinus), a tail-slapping specialist. As expected, lunate tails were overall less flexible than heterocercal tails and had greater flexural stiffness. Our results suggest that the cross-sectional profile of the skeletally supported dorsal lobe dictates flexural stiffness, but that changing tissue composition dictates flexural stiffness in the ventral lobe. We also found structural differences that may enable the tail slapping behavior of the common thresher shark. Finally, we discuss how our morphological measurements compare to ichthyosaur measurements from the literature; noting that similarities in functional morphology suggest sharks may be a good analogue for understanding ichthyosaur swimming biomechanics.
====
pay-walled:
Egon Heiss, Daniel Schwarz & Nicolai Konow (2019)
Chewing or not? Intraoral food processing in a salamandrid newt.
Journal of Experimental Biology 222: jeb189886Â
doi: 10.1242/jeb.189886
Food processing refers to any form of mechanical breakdown of food prior to swallowing. Variations of this behaviour are found within all major gnathostome groups. Chewing is by far the most commonly used intraoral processing mechanism and involves rhythmic mandibular jaw and hyobranchial (tongue) movements. Chewing occurs in chondrichthyans (sharks and rays), actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes), dipnoi (lungfishes) as well as amniotes and involves similarities in the patterns of muscle activity and movement of the feeding apparatus. It has been suggested that amniote chewing, which involves the interaction of movements of the mandibular jaw and the muscular tongue, has evolved as part of the tetrapod land invasion. However, little is known about food-processing mechanisms in lissamphibians, which might have retained many ancestral tetrapod features. Here, we identified a processing mechanism in the salamandrid newt, Triturus carnifex, which after prey capture displays cyclic head bobbing in concert with rhythmic jaw and tongue movements. We used high-speed fluoroscopy, anatomical reconstructions and analyses of stomach contents to show that newts, although not using their mandibular jaws, deploy a derived processing mechanism where prey items are rasped rhythmically against the dentition on the mouth roof, driven by a loop motion of the tongue. We then compared patterns and coordination of jaw and tongue movements across gnathostomes to conclude that food processing in this newt species shares traits with processing mechanisms in fish as well as amniotes. This discovery casts salamanders as promising models for reconstructing the evolution of intraoral processing mechanisms at the fishâtetrapod split.