A new issue of The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature for March 2017 is online:
Of note are comments on the the proposed designation of Diplodocus carnegii as the type species (in place of Diplodocus longus).
The original petition is here:
Emanuel Tschopp & Octávio Mateus (2016)
Case 3700
Diplodocus Marsh, 1878 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda): proposed designation of D. carnegii Hatcher, 1901 as the type species
The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature 73(1):17-24. 2016
pdf of the full original petition:
===
Comments now published:
Cary Woodruff (2017)
Comment (Case 3700) — Support for the proposed designation of Diplodocus carnegii Hatcher, 1901, as type species of Diplodocus Marsh, 1878.
The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature March 73(2-4): 127-127
*****
Spencer G. Lucas (2017)
Comment (Case 3700) — Support for designating Diplodocus carnegii Hatcher, 1901 as the type species of Diplodocus Marsh, 1878 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda).
The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature March 73(2-4): 128
****
Mickey Mortimer (2017)
Comment (Case 3700) — A statement against the proposed designation of Diplodocus carnegii Hatcher, 1901 as the type species of Diplodocus Marsh, 1878 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda)
The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature March 73(2-4): 129-131
****
Vahe D. Demirjian (2017)
Comment (Case 3700) — On the proposed designation of Diplodocus carnegii Hatcher, 1901 as the type species of Diplodocus Marsh, 1878 (Dinosauria, Sauropoda): application should be rejected based on new data
The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature March 73(2-4): 132–133
doi: 10.21805/bzn.v73i2.a15
***
Michael P. Taylor (2017)
Comment (Case 3700) — Support for Diplodocus carnegii Hatcher, 1901 being designated as the type species of Diplodocus Marsh, 1878.
The Bulletin of Zoological Nomenclature March 73(2-4): 134-135
pdf of text: