[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dakotaraptor - seriously??

To: "dinosaur@usc.edu" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Dakotaraptor - seriously??
From: Hammer <hammeris1@att.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 22:17:10 +0000 (UTC)
References: <1270407526.15469962.1449526630577.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: Hammer <hammeris1@att.net>
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

I'm a little shocked that the original researchers would somehow miss this 
being a chimera.  How solid is the foundation of this new paper?

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Dakotaraptor - seriously??
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>
- Re: Dakotaraptor - seriously??
  - From: "John D'Angelo" <assuming.dinosaur@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Dinosaurs rose faster than thought after redating of Triassic Chañares Formation in Argentina
Next by Date: Re: Greatest dangers in the Hell Creek environment
Previous by thread: Re: Dinosaurs rose faster than thought after redating of Triassic Chañares Formation in Argentina
Next by thread: RE: Dakotaraptor - seriously??
Indexes: