[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
More Wikipedia articles -- still don't reply
The following is not about dinosaurs in particular; although it's mostly
about science, it's still off topic. I post it here because I know that
many list members are interested in it (even more, no doubt, than are
interested in phylogenetic nomenclature). Any replies should be made
offlist or, better yet, in the articles or their talk pages.
This time I tried to disentangle the Wikipedia articles on cladistics
and phylogenetics. This work isn't finished; there's still stuff in the
cladistics article that should probably be moved to the phylogenetics
article, and a lot of what probably belongs into the phylogenetics
article is in the cladogram article, and so on... and many references
are still missing, but I don't have time to continue now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cladistics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phylogenetics