Re: How is withholding access to published specimens ethical?

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: How is withholding access to published specimens ethical?
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 03:10:52 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ip0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <BLU171-W63693F9950D0F3EA739CAAAC0B0@phx.gbl>
References: <BLU171-W1369E8118BB0583F340D63BAC0B0@phx.gbl>,<CAAhrED0xxW73oi2jmu+q_NqQ9qQkkPLzRGCpaAFWovvb8_mp+Q@mail.gmail.com> <BLU171-W63693F9950D0F3EA739CAAAC0B0@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

 Charig, who banned anyone from distributing his thesis,
 even after his death


what is this I don't even

References:
- How is withholding access to published specimens ethical?
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
- Re: How is withholding access to published specimens ethical?
  - From: Andrew Farke <afarke@gmail.com>
- RE: How is withholding access to published specimens ethical?
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>