[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review

To: "mickey_mortimer111@msn.com" <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
Subject: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
From: Dr Ronald Orenstein <ron.orenstein@rogers.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:29:22 -0400
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: "<dinosaur@usc.edu>" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <COL107-W23FC9781F6E1C187FCDF6FAC050@phx.gbl>
References: <COL107-W23FC9781F6E1C187FCDF6FAC050@phx.gbl>
Reply-to: ron.orenstein@rogers.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Excuse my ignorance, but when was the evidence of parental care in hadrosaurs 
(which I thought was based on evidence that the young remained in the nest for 
some time?) refuted?

Ronald Orenstein 
1825 Shady Creek Court
Mississauga, ON
Canada L5L 3W2

On 2011-09-13, at 7:23 AM, Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com> wrote:

> 
> I decided to review the show on my blog.  Read more at 
> http://theropoddatabase.blogspot.com/2011/09/dinosaur-revolution-review.html 
> if you enjoy scathing criticism and snarky comments.
> 
> Mickey Mortimer
>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
  - From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>

References:
- Dinosaur Revolution Review
  - From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>

Prev by Date: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Next by Date: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Previous by thread: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Next by thread: Re: Dinosaur Revolution Review
Indexes: