[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: What polar deciduous forests were like

To: <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>, "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: What polar deciduous forests were like
From: "Scott" <hmwh@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:37:28 -0500
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
References: <4EBAC2CC.9030605@gmx.at>
Reply-to: hmwh@comcast.net
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

A 10-15 million year separation from the late Cretaceous seems like a hugeinterval of time to me, an ignorant lay lurker. Is there any way to drawretrospective inferences from this paper regarding the polar flora 65+ mya?

Scott Perry

----- Original Message -----From: "David Marjanovic" <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

To: "DML" <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: What polar deciduous forests were like

The bad news: the site is early Eocene, not Mesozoic.
The good news: the paper is free.
http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/11/08/rspb.2011.1704

References:
- What polar deciduous forests were like
  - From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>

Prev by Date: The Sundance Sea
Next by Date: Re: What polar deciduous forests were like
Previous by thread: What polar deciduous forests were like
Next by thread: RE: What polar deciduous forests were like
Indexes: