[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

RE: Saltopus... a silesaurid?

To: <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: RE: Saltopus... a silesaurid?
From: Mickey Mortimer <mickey_mortimer111@msn.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 03:57:42 -0700
Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <BANLkTinE3UOeHTfbC8oBQ+FKN5+0rnkgPg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinE3UOeHTfbC8oBQ+FKN5+0rnkgPg@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: mickey_mortimer111@msn.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Tim Williams wrote-

> This made me wonder. *If* _Lewisuchus_ and _Pseudolagosuchus_ were
> combined into a single taxon (OTU), and the phylogenetic analysis of
> Benton and Walker (2011) was re-run with _Saltopus_ included... would
> _Saltopus_ fall out as a member of the Silesauridae? Is this
> something someone (Mickey?) could test?

Haha.  Easy enough, just send me the paper.

Mickey Mortimer

References:
- Saltopus... a silesaurid?
  - From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Saltopus... a silesaurid?
Next by Date: RE: Saltopus... a silesaurid?
Previous by thread: Re: Saltopus... a silesaurid?
Next by thread: RE: Saltopus... a silesaurid?
Indexes: