Re: Cryptodraco vs Cryptosaurus (was Re: Aussiedraco, new Australian pteranodontoid pterosaur)

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Cryptodraco vs Cryptosaurus (was Re: Aussiedraco, new Australian pteranodontoid pterosaur)
From: Don Ohmes <d_ohmes@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:36:36 -0400
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <AANLkTimPWxK_J=9L5jAnjZdDFr96+jesfq69DeBi8Psh@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimPWxK_J=9L5jAnjZdDFr96+jesfq69DeBi8Psh@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: d_ohmes@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

On 3/23/2011 12:25 AM, Tim Williams wrote:

As for_Pantydraco_  ("Pant-y-ffynnon
dragon")... perhaps the less said the better.


I rest my case.

References:
- Cryptodraco vs Cryptosaurus (was Re: Aussiedraco, new Australian pteranodontoid pterosaur)
  - From: Tim Williams <tijawi@gmail.com>