Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes

To: mike@indexdata.com
Subject: Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:09:15 -0300
Authentication-results: msg-ironport2.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
Cc: dinosaur mailing list <dinosaur@usc.edu>
In-reply-to: <AANLkTikmziV4A6=5ZO4JBBEJvhwMnonz7U_gr=xyGW3O@mail.gmail.com>
References: <ae3.4e138fdd.3ab4b6b7@aol.com> <AANLkTi=SmDbdOVUe=nKsmNBKC7v1ADfK6wsB3EL7K68Y@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: augustoharo@gmail.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

After all, actual posture is not very important in the usage most
papers give to skeletal restoration, namely showing which bones are
present.

References:
- Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: GSP1954@aol.com
- Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: Mike Taylor <mike@indexdata.com>
- Re: Notes on scientifically comparative paleoposes
  - From: Augusto Haro <augustoharo@gmail.com>