[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Morpho v molecular (was Re: Tinamous: living dinosaurs)
- To: dinosaur@usc.edu
- Subject: Re: Morpho v molecular (was Re: Tinamous: living dinosaurs)
- From: evelyn sobielski <koreke77@yahoo.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 04:03:04 +0100 (BST)
- Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- In-reply-to: <BANLkTi=xKG3vdS3rYKchkb+tw=Y_U2otsw@mail.gmail.com>
- Reply-to: koreke77@yahoo.de
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
> > You never see more genes and sequenced taxa leading to
> molecular results that resemble the traditional
> > morphological results after all. The changes always
> seem to go one way.
Wrong.
It's more that major embarrassments in science tend to be quickly forgotten.
E.g. Passeriformes basal among crown Aves, early divergences of Metazoa, rodent
polyphyly etc.
Regards,
Eike