[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Cretaceous diplodocids in Asia?
From: Ben Creisler
bh480@scn.org
In case this paper has not been mentioned yet:
JOHN A. WHITLOCK, MICHAEL D. D?EMIC, JEFFREY A. WILSON
(2011)
Cretaceous diplodocids in Asia? Re-evaluating the
phylogenetic affinities of a fragmentary specimen.
Palaeontology
Early View (Articles online in advance of print)
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01029.x
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1475-
4983.2010.01029.x/abstract
The recent description of an anterior caudal vertebra
purportedly belonging to a diplodocid sauropod from the
Early Cretaceous of China has the potential to
drastically alter our interpretation of the evolution and
timing of geographical dispersal of a major dinosaur
lineage. However, comparison with a wider taxonomic
sample points more strongly towards titanosauriform
affinities for this specimen, which is in keeping with
the affinities of all other sauropods known from the
Cretaceous of Asia. We explain the disparity in
phylogenetic interpretation of this isolated vertebra as
a by-product of scoring differences and analysis of
fragmentary material using repurposed data matrices.
Rescoring the isolated vertebra based on our
interpretation of the anatomy and rerunning the original
analyses removes the specimen from Diplodocoidea but does
not place it within Titanosauriformes, because of
inadequacy in taxon and character sampling inherited from
the repurposed data matrices. We suggest that
phylogenetic analysis must begin with an initial
hypothesis of affinity, based on comparative anatomy and
spatiotemporal distributions, that must be adequately
tested by the data matrix employed ? i.e. data matrices
should be tailored to sample anatomically, geographically
and temporally relevant clades, and new characters should
be added in tandem with new taxa so that the potential
synapomorphy pool is not diluted. This is especially
important for analyses of fragmentary specimens, which
are likely to return coarse phylogenetic results with
general evolutionary and palaeobiogeographical
implications.