[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]
Re: Dilophosaurus
- To: Dinosaur Mailing List <dinosaur@usc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Dilophosaurus
- From: Mike Keesey <keesey@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 10:50:01 -0700
- Authentication-results: msg-ironport1.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
- In-reply-to: <14847.6024419f.3b8e6e1e@aol.com>
- References: <14847.6024419f.3b8e6e1e@aol.com>
- Reply-to: keesey@gmail.com
- Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:47 AM, <GSP1954@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Avepoda cannot be identical to Theropoda unless the later is defined to
> exclude every single basal theropod with a metatarsal I that contacts the
> ankle.
Right, exactly.
Are there known, definite non-avepod theropods? My impression is that
the possible ones might also be non-eusaurischian saurischians.
--
T. Michael Keesey
http://tmkeesey.net/