Re: Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?

To: DML <dinosaur@usc.edu>
Subject: Re: Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?
From: David Marjanovic <david.marjanovic@gmx.at>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:21:58 +0200
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <1314140325.50371.YahooMailRC@web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
References: <1314068596.88212.YahooMailClassic@web32504.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <B1784C0A659741A281AEDA2035A17F55@TYRANT> <49989.68.55.7.246.1314139684.squirrel@www.geol.umd.edu> <1314140325.50371.YahooMailRC@web27207.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
Reply-to: david.marjanovic@gmx.at
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

 from Fowler (in prep):

 Lower Maastrichtian: top: 69.23

That's an extremely precise date. How did you get it? If bycyclostratigraphy, why isn't the K-Pg boundary as precisely dated? ~:-|

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?
  - From: Jocelyn Falconnet <j.falconnet@gmail.com>

References:
- Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?
  - From: Saint Abyssal <saint_abyssal@yahoo.com>
- RE: Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>
- Re: Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?
  - From: "Thomas R. Holtz, Jr." <tholtz@umd.edu>
- Re: Public Database of Geologic Formation Ages?
  - From: Denver Fowler <df9465@yahoo.co.uk>