[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Subject Index][Author Index]

Re: Platecarpus tympaniticus - how to analyze a nomen dubium

To: dinosaur@usc.edu
Subject: Re: Platecarpus tympaniticus - how to analyze a nomen dubium
From: Tim Williams <tijawi@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:13:21 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-results: msg-ironport0.usc.edu; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
In-reply-to: <1580675941-1285165090-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-963085199-@bda2835.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Reply-to: tijawi@yahoo.com
Sender: owner-DINOSAUR@usc.edu

Kelly Wicks <kwicks78@gmail.com> wrote:

> One minor correction...
> 
> Trexler & Sweeney 1995 bone bed is now 2010 Ryan
> Medusaceratops. Which is in the lower Judith if I recall
> correctly. 

I haven't seen the _Medusaceratops_ paper, but I don't doubt you're right.  The 
_Albertaceratops_ holotype comes from the Milk River, Alberta.  The bonebed is 
in Montana; yes, it's lower Judith.  

Cheers

Tim

References:
- Re: Platecarpus tympaniticus - how to analyze a nomen dubium
  - From: "Kelly Wicks" <kwicks78@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Ceratops analyzed in the Sampson et al. (2010) matrix
Next by Date: Re: Ceratops analyzed in the Sampson et al. (2010) matrix
Previous by thread: Re: Platecarpus tympaniticus - how to analyze a nomen dubium
Next by thread: RE: Platecarpus tympaniticus - how to analyze a nomen dubium
Indexes: